Monday, February 23, 2009

Compass Rose - (Part 2 of 2)

This is a continuation, more or less, of a much earlier entry entitled Compass Rose.

Last week we rented the floor sanding equipment again and finished the rest of our hardwood floors. It was a marathon floor finishing session, during which we applied 13.5 gallons of oil based polyurethane. I've decided that oil based polyurethane smells like bad tequila, with a hangover to match, but I'm convinced it's better than water-based polyurethane, if for no other reason than the fact that they're outlawing the oil based stuff in several states now. (due to the VOC's?) It does give the wood a nice amber glow that I don't see in water based finishes.

Here's a second picture of the compass rosette, without the reflections from the window. The wood species are: white oak, cherry, walnut, and hard maple.

Very soon, before the sanding process is nothing but a distant memory for me, I'll post what we learned about the various types of floor sanders. We used three different walk-behind types, and two different edging sanders in the course of finishing approximately 3500 square feet of floors.

Just for kicks, here's a picture of this same floor, almost three years ago when we were raising the frame. This picture might give you a panoramic sense of the view from this room, as it's impossible to convey this now with a camera by photographing through glass.

Because I've witnessed two spontaneous combustion events at my own house site, I feel obliged to include this floor-finishing reminder... ALWAYS dispose of oily rags and sanding dust in a metal container far away from anything flammable or of value. Last week I made a checklist of the disposition of anything combustible that I reviewed and initialed at the end of every work day.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Plumbing a Freezer?

Because we raise our own beef and grow a lot of our own vegetables, having a reliable, energy efficient freezer is a must. We make our own electricity and it's very reliable, so we don't have to worry about a grid power outage ruining a season's worth of food. This independence and reliability comes at a price though. Our solar panels make only so much electricity each month, and expanding the array is expensive, so we are always conscious of our energy budget. We spent a considerable amount of time looking for an energy efficient freezer. In the course of our research, we found three things to be universally true...

1. High end commercial freezers are energy hogs! For those high-end manufacturers that do publish energy consumption numbers, the numbers are pitiful. Best to stick with consumer models because, ironically, cheaper is better when you start shopping energy star stickers.

2. Chest freezers use less energy (on a cubic foot basis) than upright freezers. But we have two hand-me-down chest freezers, and we know from experience that the food (and trophy animals awaiting the taxidermist) on the bottom can get lost for years. No one wants to dive head first into the freezer to dig out anything except maybe Bryer's ice cream or t-bone steaks (but the good stuff never sifts to the bottom anyway!) The result: at least a third of our chest freezers' capacity goes unused, thereby offsetting the energy savings of this style. We opted to forgo the "theoretical energy savings" of a chest freezer and bought an upright freezer instead.

3. Manual defrost freezers use a lot less energy than automatic defrost freezers. In fact, automatic defrost freezers use about 50% more energy than manual defrost freezers, because they actually heat up internally, at regular intervals (24hrs?), enough to melt the ice inside the freezer. Whatsmore, the automatic thaw-freeze cycle can cause freezer burn to any food that touches the internal walls of the freezer. So manual defrost freezers are superior from an energy standpoint as well as a food quality standpoint. But what about the inconvenience of manually defrosting?

As a kid, I remember my mother and grandmother hacking maniacally and relentlessly at their freezers with ice picks and the resulting melty mess that was left on the floor. I would wait patiently for the biggest chunks of ice to eat. I don't think I ever actually ate a whole chunk - the ice always tasted like "freezer." More often, I'd sneak off and drop the ice down someone's shirt. My point... defrosting a freezer is fun if you're a kid, but drudgery if you are the adult. What to do?

One day, while shopping at Lowes for a clothes-washer drain pan, I noticed they had oversized drain pans. I had a eureka moment. Would it work? I whipped out my tape measure and discovered the oversized drain pans were the exact size as the footprint of a 20 cu.ft. upright freezer. I bought one, brought it home, cut a hole in the floor, plumbed it to a small p-trap and tied it into our gray-water drain system. Voila - a freezer drain pan to take out some of the P.I.T.A. factor of defrosting a freezer. (the photo at the right shows a regular washer drain pan, not the oversized one I used under the freezer)

Yesterday we put the final coat of polyurethane on the quarter-sawn oak parquet floor in our pantry. And today we moved the freezer, ceremoniously, out of our great room and into its cubbyhole in the pantry, where it's now sitting comfortably on the oversized drain pan. Of course, we took the food out before moving the freezer, and my wife took the opportunity to defrost it (in the great room), so it'll be about 6 months before I get to test the drain pan, but I'm confident it will work. (BTW, my wife just reminded me this model has a drain plug on it that can be plumbed to a hose, but she thinks this all-encompassing-pan will work much better - in fact we're now debating whether this was my idea or hers!)

And what to do with all that extra power we'll have? Maybe buy an ice cream maker? mmm.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Off grid energy storage - practical hydrogen?

I usually post only original material on my blog, but I came across a video so incredible, I wanted to share it. (This man is incredible as well.) Like my house, this guy's house has geothermal and solar power. He has a utility line run to his house (it was his original power source and still functions as a backup), but for some reason, he's chosen not to sell power back to the grid.

I'm not selling my power back either (I don't even have an umbilical from the grid here), so the question becomes... how to save the extra energy in the sunny months so one can use it in the cloudy months? Lead acid batteries can only do so much. His solution... split water to create hydrogen, store it in LP tanks, then use a fuel cell to convert the hydrogen to electricity in the winter. Brilliant! I looked into something like that, but I couldn't get the economics to work out for me. Heck, I couldn't even locate a fuel cell for less than 6 digits. Because I live 150 feet up on a hill (with another 150 feet to the ridge), some day I'd like to implement pumped-water-storage-hydro to bank my seasonal electricity peaks. But this guy has me thinking about hydrogen for storage again...

By the way, I've been using a 15 amp, 120 volt floor sander for the past 24 hours using nothing but my off-grid power system. (While I was sleeping, the neighbor kid ran the sander!) My point is not that I'm cheap and trying to milk the 24 hour rental for all it's worth (although that much is true). The point is, if I hear someone in the media or government say that solar power isn't practical, one more time, I'm going to lose it! Solar power is absolutely practical. It's also expensive, but it is not prohibitively expensive... even in Kentucky where the available solar resource is 70% of what it might be in California. On an inflation adjusted basis, off grid solar power is the same price as grid electricity was in the 1940's. Was fossil-fuel grid power practical in the 40's? Of course it was, so how could anyone say that solar power is not practical now? OK, energy storage problems not withstanding, but we can solve that too! Please check out the video if you have 7 minutes to kill. I love the twangy banjo sound track!

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Wood Gasification Boiler

Whew, for over a month, I've been immersed in the "theory and practice of modern hydronic heating." My task was to install our wood gasification boiler, build a heat distribution manifold (the circulatory system of our house), and get our radiant heat floors going. I'm happy to report that I have accomplished my mission - it's a balmy 66 degrees inside the house now!

The heart of our hydronic heating system is a "Tarm Solo Plus 40" wood gasification boiler. This unit is made in Denmark and distributed by BioHeat USA (formerly known as Tarm USA). Unlike the outdoor wood boilers that are gaining popularity (and unfortunately notoriety in some areas) in the United States, this boiler is made to work indoors, and burns with little or no smoke. By cooking the wood and drawing gas off the wood to burn in a separate ceramic chamber (at nearly 2000 degrees!), the boiler is able to extract more than 80% of the BTU's available in the wood. By comparison, most outdoor boilers and fireplace inserts do well to achieve 50% efficiency. Less wood to cut - sounds good to me - where do I sign up? The other benefit of the super high combustion temperatures is that very few unburnt byproducts are released into the air. It's odd to see steam coming out of my chimney, but that's what's going on as I type this!

There simply aren't many tradespeople familiar with radiant heat and wood boilers in eastern Kentucky, so I decided to install the unit myself. It turned out to be a lot more complicated than I first imagined, but fortunately, I found a vast resource of friendly people and information on an internet forum devoted to wood boilers at The Tarm boiler comes with instructions, but every installation is so unique that the instructions are more or less "general guidelines." Furthermore, the instructions already assume that your radiant heat manifolds (or air handlers, or baseboard radiators) are already installed and hooked to an existing fuel oil (or natural gas) boiler. I had to start from scratch.

I began by plumbing the accessories that go directly on the back of the boiler. This is fairly standard, so the Tarm manual was helpful here. In this picture, the four copper lines pointed in the air are (from left to right), the supply line, the emergency return line, the emergency supply line, and the return line. The emergency loop is for dissipating the heat in the boiler if your power should fail (and your circulator pump stops) while a fire is in the boiler. A valve on the emergency loop opens when the power fails, and hot water can thermosiphon through the emergency loop if it is designed properly.

The red item is a Grundfos 60 watt circulator pump, and the brass "T" shaped item with red arrows is what they refer to as a "tempering valve." Its purpose is to temper the cold(er) water returning to the boiler, by mixing in the appropriate amount of hot supply water. This keeps the boiler running at the proper temperature regardless of the heating loads. After I finished plumbing all of this, I pressure tested my threaded fittings and sweat joints and everything looked good to go, so I rolled the unit into its permanent location. (Spatially, it is in the basement, directly under my fireplace but it uses a dedicated flue in the chimney.)

*** warning - skip this paragraph if you're not fascinated by pipe thread trivia ***

I'm leaving out a lot of the _really_ boring details, but one detail that deserves mentioning is the pipe-sealant that comes with this European boiler. Whereas in the U.S., we use tapered threads (aka NPT) that get snug after a certain number of turns, the Europeans use straight threads that never get tight no matter how many times you turn one pipe within a fitting. (please, someone from the EU correct me if I'm wrong!) The systems are otherwise similar in that the threads have the same pitch and diameter on both continents. Fittings and pipes will interchange. In the US, we commonly apply teflon tape and sometimes pipe dope to help seal the tapered threads. And this is where it gets interesting (if it ever does)... The boiler manufacturer sees fit to include a unique pipe sealant better suited to the straight threads on their boiler taps. With their system, you wrap the pipe threads with long dry fibers that smell like wet dogs stewed in sour milk (hemp? horse hair?) , and then apply a generous portion of some squishy substance which is partially composed of "animal lipids," before twisting the pipe into the fitting. It was so delightfully archaic that I used their system on all of the fittings I could until I ran out of the stuff. My wife and I were cracking up at this stuff. (if I could have over-ridden my gag reflex, I might have tricked her into smelling those fibers too). Was it a joke on stupid Americans, or would it work? The joints performed fabulously during the pressure test and subsequent operation - no leaks whatsoever. Now I know what to use for pipe sealant in a post-apocolyptic, non-industrialized society should I ever find myself in such a scenario.
*** end pipe thread trivia warning ***

*** warning, veering off topic, gratuitous Appalachian scenery ***
Midway through my installation, we were hit with an ice storm here in Kentucky (reminiscent of the 2003 ice storm that felled all of the trees that became our house). The miserable weather just provided me with more incentive to get the heat functioning in the house! I took this picture from a second floor window, looking south. Fortunately, very few trees fell in this latest ice storm.

*** end warning, back on topic ***

With the boiler plumbed, I focused my attention on the heat distribution manifolds. Some day, I'll make a proper diagram of the whole system and post it here (my wife insists I make one some time before I die), but for now, I'll just point out some of the highlights that might be interesting to someone designing their own hydronic heating system.

First, the architecture is "primary-secondary." In hydronic-speak, this means there is a single primary loop that circulates the heat in the system, with several secondary loops tying in at various points along the way in order to extract heat for various functions in the house. With ths architecture, the pressure and flow in each of the secondary loops is isolated from the primary loop (and therefore from each other). One of my secondary loops is the radiant heat loop. Another of my secondary loops is my indirect domestic hot water heater. I may add other secondary loops in the future (e.g. a huge hot water tank to store heat, a solar hot water collector, a clothes dryer that uses hot water for heat, etc.) . It's very easy to add on to this architecture and that's one of the reasons I chose it. The more widely used alternative is to have one giant supply manifold and one giant return manifold, but that architecture has drawacks that I won't go into now.

Another important aspect of this design (and virtually all hydronic radiant heat designs) is how to obtain the proper temperature for the radiant heat zones. Specifically, the boiler heats water to 180 degrees whereas water somewhere between 110 and 150 degrees is appropriate for radiant heat floors. There are several sophisticated ways to achieve the temperature drop, but I chose the rather simple method of a three way thermostatic mixing valve. In this picture, 180 degree water from the primary loop enters the top port of the mixing valve, cooler water returning from the floors enters the left port of the mixing valve, and 130 degree water magically exits the bottom port of the mixing valve. The valve is entirely mechanical (no electrical components), and presumably fairly reliable. This one is made to be taken apart and cleaned, should that ever be necessary. Incidentally, the copper T in the upperleftmost of the same photograph is where the rest of the return water from the floors is injected back into the primary loop.

At least one more aspect of the system deserves mentioning... Because the entire heating system is using off-grid solar/battery power, I was very critical of the power consumption of the circulators (pumps), zone valves, and the boiler fan. My concern was heightened by the fact that the heating system is most in demand when my solar resources are at a triple minimum... (1) during the winter... (2) during cloudy days, and (3) at night. The boiler requires only a small circulator because it does nothing but circulate water through the relatively short primary loop. I chose a Grundfos 15-58, which consumes only 60 watts. It has a low speed setting that I might get by with that uses only 48 watts. The fan on the Tarm boiler only uses about 50 watts. These are manageable, but not insignificant numbers (50 watts + 60 watts). With these components pretty much "fixed," I focussed my attention (i.e. budget!) on the large circulator that pushes water through almost one mile of 1/2" pex pipe in the floors of the house. For this task, I found a German (they are more energy conscious than us Americans) made WILO Stratos pump that is super efficient. In fact, it has a microprocessor that will vary the pump speed based on how many zones are calling for heat. (The technology to control the pump speed is called ECM for "electronically commutated motor.") The motor draws between 9 and 130 watts, and in my application, I think it will usually be drawing about 80 watts based on my measurements. A conventional circulator pump for this application would probably draw at least 150 watts constantly.

Well - that's it for now. I could go on about how to check for leaks, sweat joints, choose a pex manifold, store heat, bleed lines, etc., but most of that stuff is already on the internet. I've included just enough detail here to bore most folks to tears, while not enough detail to reproduce my results and avoid my mistakes. If you have questions about this system, or questions about a system you are designing or modifying, I am glad to offer what little knowledge I have picked up while building this system. I'm still tinkering and will post updates later on. For now, the house is warm and I can work in my T-shirt! On to other unfinished, inside projects...